History Lesson: Seraphine de Senlis

A few weeks ago I saw a movie called Seraphine. The film was about the eccen­tric French painter Seraphine Louis (1864–1942). Very lit­tle is actu­ally known about her life, how­ever one fact is known that before she had turned 8, both of her par­ents had died leav­ing her to become a house keeper and ser­vant, an occu­pa­tion she had for most of her life.

As an adult, Seraphine rented a small secluded room in the town of Sen­lis, France where she lived and painted by can­dle light at night ‘using col­ors that she made her­self from unusual and exotic ingre­di­ents she never revealed that have stood the test of time for durable vividness.’*

In 1912 Seraphine’s paint­ings were dis­cov­ered by the Ger­man art col­lec­tor Wil­helm Uhde. Uhde came to Sen­lis for a rest from his work as an art critic. He had rented a large apart­ment and hired Seraphine as his house­keeper. His neigh­bors upon find­ing out that they were liv­ing next to the promi­nent art dealer, critic, writer and col­lec­tor Wil­helm Uhde invited him to a din­ner party to dis­cuss art and cul­ture. Uhde accepted the invi­ta­tion and attended. Dur­ing din­ner Uhde saw a paint­ing of some Apples, strik­ing and unusual in color and form, he Mar­veled at the beauty, strange­ness and artistry of the piece. Uhde inquired about the artist learn­ing that it was in fact a paint­ing done by his house­keeper Seraphine.

Uhde smit­ten with this paint­ing buys it out­right from his neigh­bor and rushes home. Upon his dis­cov­ery he con­fronts Seraphine and slowly over a brief two years the two begin a friend­ship. Uhde begun to col­lect a num­ber Seraphine’s work pay­ing her cash in hopes it would sup­port her and encour­age her to paint more.

In 1914 the war broke out between France and Ger­many, Uhde feared for his life and fled France entirely in the mid­dle of the night with his sis­ter, tak­ing only what he could carry which included a paint­ing by Henri Rousseau. Other paint­ings he had col­lected were left behind. As the town of Sen­lis was pil­laged, Uhde’s col­lec­tion was con­fis­cated and sold at auc­tion or destroyed. Among these were the acquired paint­ings of  Seraphine Louis which have been lost forever.

It was not until 1years later in 927 when Uhde redis­cov­ered Seraphine’s paint­ings. Liv­ing in Chan­tilly, France at the time, he attended an exhi­bi­tion of painted works done by ama­teur artists from Sen­lis. He saw a paint­ing that he rec­og­nized to be Seraphine’s and knew he had to see if his great painter had sur­vived the war. He trav­eled back to Sen­lis to find her still liv­ing in quiet iso­la­tion in her tiny room filled with more paint­ings and an alter of can­dles illu­mi­nat­ing a pic­ture of the Vir­gin Mary. The des­o­la­tion of WWI had left Seraphine even more poverty stricken and hun­gry than ever before. Uhde, speech­less and over­whelmed with joy to have reunited with her became her bene­fac­tor, sup­ply­ing her with deliv­er­ies of large can­vases, paints and sup­plies and a stipend. Seraphine’s paint­ings became larger and larger and more sat­u­rated with rich col­ors of fan­tas­ti­cal flo­ral arrange­ments. The larger her work became the more it began to sell.  Life for Seraphine Louis,  for only a short while was enjoy­able. Her friend­ship with Uhde had cat­a­pulted her into a period of finan­cial suc­cess she had never known before. She now could paint all day, all night at any hour in a stu­dio sep­a­rate from her liv­ing quar­ters. Such lux­ury she had never known before and was ill equipped to han­dle. This new finan­cial equa­nim­ity over­whelmed her, she squan­dered much of her new wealth on frivolities.

The onset of the Great Depres­sion dev­as­tated the world. In 1930 art buy­ers and col­lec­tors could no longer afford to buy the work that they loved and sup­ported. Uhde suf­fer­ing the effects as well, could no longer afford to sup­port Seraphine as an artist or her per­sonal expen­di­tures. Shortly there­after Seraphine’s men­tal state became erratic and unsta­ble she grew depressed, despon­dent and began to slip into lunacy. In 1932 she was admit­ted into a hos­pi­tal for the insane for chronic psy­chosis where she died in 1942 alone.

While hos­pi­tal­ized and after her death Uhde con­tin­ued to show her paint­ings. At the Mod­ern Prim­i­tives Exhi­bi­tion in Paris in 1932, as well as Pop­u­lar Mas­ters of Real­ity in Paris in 1937, in addi­tion to other shows includ­ing a solo show in Paris and in New York at The Museum of Mod­ern Art. Her paint­ings are now part of the col­lec­tions of the Musée d’art de Sen­lis, Musee Malliol in Paris, the Musée d’art naïf in Nice, and the Musée d’Art mod­erne Lille Métro­pole in Vil­leneuve d’Ascq.

Seraphine’s work of flo­ral arrange­ments are in no way anal­o­gous to bun­dles of real flow­ers and foliage filler. Hers hold mys­ti­cal and fan­tas­ti­cal ele­ments like a leaf that becomes an eye or a mon­strous fruit. Hav­ing no train­ing or knowl­edge of the arts, Seraphine’s work has often been described as of the Naive Style,which accord­ing to wikipedia is a clas­si­fi­ca­tion of art that is often char­ac­ter­ized by a child­like sim­plic­ity in its sub­ject mat­ter and tech­nique. How­ever clas­si­fied, her innate sen­si­bil­ity to the dec­o­ra­tive is aston­ish­ing and bril­liant in color and form show­ing a soul with both a sen­si­tiv­ity and fear toward the nat­ural world.


*wike­pe­dia

11 Responses to “History Lesson: Seraphine de Senlis”

  1. Philip Perlman says:

    I, too, was struck by the film which I just viewed and sub­se­quently began a Google search to find images of her works. I came across Art­Net but unfor­tu­nately the prices of her works are not spec­i­fied and, while I may join the lat­ter, I don’t appre­ci­ate pay­ing to ascer­tain the price:).

    I will con­tinue my search for books with her paint­ings and other means of view­ing her works. If you should have any knowl­edge of any of these and wish to con­vey said, you may email me at the above which is my ‘for pub­lic use’ email. Upon receipt I will add your address to my ‘accept­able’ list at my ISP and send you a reply with my reg­u­lar email address.

    Thanks so much for the infor­ma­tion and points of view.

    as always,

    /* Philip */

  2. I too came upon your nice blog while search­ing for Seraphine info on Google after see­ing the film 2 nights ago. Delightful.

  3. Susan Bernard says:

    I just watched this DVD, and was truly taken by Seraphine’s story. It is amaz­ing to me that the pas­sion she showed in her work, which enabled her to paint for so many years when no one rec­og­nized her tal­ent, was cat­e­go­rized as men­tal ill­ness after her breakdown.

    And, it makes me won­der what Mr. Uhde did for her when she was insti­tu­tion­al­ized, and he was prof­it­ing from her art.

  4. Christina Scimeca says:

    What a sur­pris­ing film about a bril­liant woman and artist. I, too, won­dered where her “bene­fac­tor” dis­ap­peared. The char­ac­ter of him did not seem com­plete. I just viewed it this evening and I cher­ish the intro­duc­tion to such a fine and mes­mer­iz­ing artist.

  5. Debbie Fremming says:

    I viewed the film today and was fas­ci­nated. Thanks so much for the back­ground. I’m a teacher of French and it is always good to learn more to share with my stu­dents. Unfor­tu­nately, Seraphine was not the first nor will she be the last to squan­der the for­tune that may fol­low suc­cess. She might not even be con­sid­ered men­tally ill today, just very eccen­tric. I, also, was trou­bled by her “benefactor’s” behav­ior in the film.

  6. Karen Mahnken says:

    At the end of the film, it is shown that her bene­fac­tor, Mr. Uhde, pro­vides a pri­vate room for her, so she’s no longer in a ward. Con­sid­er­ing the time and how they dealt with men­tal prob­lems, it was prob­a­bly all he was able to do. A beau­ti­fully made movie.

  7. PhyllisRobbins says:

    Iwas very moved by Seraphine’s story. She painted because she had to paint. Each paint­ing was her unique response to her love of nature.
    Does this remind one of Van Gogh?

  8. Ceparie says:

    I am sur­prised this sum­mary did not include Seraphine’s devo­tion to the Holy Mary. I believe that she was empow­ered by the great spirit that is the mys­tery of all creations.

  9. Vida Tsynham says:

    I too, injured the movie and his­tory of the this truly tal­ented woman. Tragic really. I was look­ing to pur­chase a print how­ever can’t find a site that sells any prints. Also any sites I find on pric­ing, require a feet join. Not going to hap­pen. I’ll keep looking.….what a sad story but what beauty she left behind.

    Appre­ci­at­ing the art

  10. Sandy says:

    I watched the movie last evening and was moved by Seraphine’s life and curi­ous about how she inter­preted the beauty of nature. The world is lucky that Wil­helm Uhde “dis­cov­ered” her work.

  11. Deborah says:

    Is there a chance enough of us could get together and show a demand for prints of Seraphine de Sen­lis work that a pro­ducer just might feel it would be worth­while to pro­duce the prints? There are so many prints of Monet’s work and other artists. It seems a ter­ri­ble shame that Seraphine’s work can­not be appre­ci­ated except by a very lucky few.

Leave a Reply