A few weeks ago I saw a movie called Seraphine. The film was about the eccentric French painter Seraphine Louis (1864–1942). Very little is actually known about her life, however one fact is known that before she had turned 8, both of her parents had died leaving her to become a house keeper and servant, an occupation she had for most of her life.
As an adult, Seraphine rented a small secluded room in the town of Senlis, France where she lived and painted by candle light at night ‘using colors that she made herself from unusual and exotic ingredients she never revealed that have stood the test of time for durable vividness.’*
In 1912 Seraphine’s paintings were discovered by the German art collector Wilhelm Uhde. Uhde came to Senlis for a rest from his work as an art critic. He had rented a large apartment and hired Seraphine as his housekeeper. His neighbors upon finding out that they were living next to the prominent art dealer, critic, writer and collector Wilhelm Uhde invited him to a dinner party to discuss art and culture. Uhde accepted the invitation and attended. During dinner Uhde saw a painting of some Apples, striking and unusual in color and form, he Marveled at the beauty, strangeness and artistry of the piece. Uhde inquired about the artist learning that it was in fact a painting done by his housekeeper Seraphine.
Uhde smitten with this painting buys it outright from his neighbor and rushes home. Upon his discovery he confronts Seraphine and slowly over a brief two years the two begin a friendship. Uhde begun to collect a number Seraphine’s work paying her cash in hopes it would support her and encourage her to paint more.
In 1914 the war broke out between France and Germany, Uhde feared for his life and fled France entirely in the middle of the night with his sister, taking only what he could carry which included a painting by Henri Rousseau. Other paintings he had collected were left behind. As the town of Senlis was pillaged, Uhde’s collection was confiscated and sold at auction or destroyed. Among these were the acquired paintings of Seraphine Louis which have been lost forever.
It was not until 1years later in 927 when Uhde rediscovered Seraphine’s paintings. Living in Chantilly, France at the time, he attended an exhibition of painted works done by amateur artists from Senlis. He saw a painting that he recognized to be Seraphine’s and knew he had to see if his great painter had survived the war. He traveled back to Senlis to find her still living in quiet isolation in her tiny room filled with more paintings and an alter of candles illuminating a picture of the Virgin Mary. The desolation of WWI had left Seraphine even more poverty stricken and hungry than ever before. Uhde, speechless and overwhelmed with joy to have reunited with her became her benefactor, supplying her with deliveries of large canvases, paints and supplies and a stipend. Seraphine’s paintings became larger and larger and more saturated with rich colors of fantastical floral arrangements. The larger her work became the more it began to sell. Life for Seraphine Louis, for only a short while was enjoyable. Her friendship with Uhde had catapulted her into a period of financial success she had never known before. She now could paint all day, all night at any hour in a studio separate from her living quarters. Such luxury she had never known before and was ill equipped to handle. This new financial equanimity overwhelmed her, she squandered much of her new wealth on frivolities.
The onset of the Great Depression devastated the world. In 1930 art buyers and collectors could no longer afford to buy the work that they loved and supported. Uhde suffering the effects as well, could no longer afford to support Seraphine as an artist or her personal expenditures. Shortly thereafter Seraphine’s mental state became erratic and unstable she grew depressed, despondent and began to slip into lunacy. In 1932 she was admitted into a hospital for the insane for chronic psychosis where she died in 1942 alone.
While hospitalized and after her death Uhde continued to show her paintings. At the Modern Primitives Exhibition in Paris in 1932, as well as Popular Masters of Reality in Paris in 1937, in addition to other shows including a solo show in Paris and in New York at The Museum of Modern Art. Her paintings are now part of the collections of the Musée d’art de Senlis, Musee Malliol in Paris, the Musée d’art naïf in Nice, and the Musée d’Art moderne Lille Métropole in Villeneuve d’Ascq.
Seraphine’s work of floral arrangements are in no way analogous to bundles of real flowers and foliage filler. Hers hold mystical and fantastical elements like a leaf that becomes an eye or a monstrous fruit. Having no training or knowledge of the arts, Seraphine’s work has often been described as of the Naive Style,which according to wikipedia is a classification of art that is often characterized by a childlike simplicity in its subject matter and technique. However classified, her innate sensibility to the decorative is astonishing and brilliant in color and form showing a soul with both a sensitivity and fear toward the natural world.









I, too, was struck by the film which I just viewed and subsequently began a Google search to find images of her works. I came across ArtNet but unfortunately the prices of her works are not specified and, while I may join the latter, I don’t appreciate paying to ascertain the price:).
I will continue my search for books with her paintings and other means of viewing her works. If you should have any knowledge of any of these and wish to convey said, you may email me at the above which is my ‘for public use’ email. Upon receipt I will add your address to my ‘acceptable’ list at my ISP and send you a reply with my regular email address.
Thanks so much for the information and points of view.
as always,
/* Philip */
I too came upon your nice blog while searching for Seraphine info on Google after seeing the film 2 nights ago. Delightful.
I just watched this DVD, and was truly taken by Seraphine’s story. It is amazing to me that the passion she showed in her work, which enabled her to paint for so many years when no one recognized her talent, was categorized as mental illness after her breakdown.
And, it makes me wonder what Mr. Uhde did for her when she was institutionalized, and he was profiting from her art.
What a surprising film about a brilliant woman and artist. I, too, wondered where her “benefactor” disappeared. The character of him did not seem complete. I just viewed it this evening and I cherish the introduction to such a fine and mesmerizing artist.
I viewed the film today and was fascinated. Thanks so much for the background. I’m a teacher of French and it is always good to learn more to share with my students. Unfortunately, Seraphine was not the first nor will she be the last to squander the fortune that may follow success. She might not even be considered mentally ill today, just very eccentric. I, also, was troubled by her “benefactor’s” behavior in the film.
At the end of the film, it is shown that her benefactor, Mr. Uhde, provides a private room for her, so she’s no longer in a ward. Considering the time and how they dealt with mental problems, it was probably all he was able to do. A beautifully made movie.
Iwas very moved by Seraphine’s story. She painted because she had to paint. Each painting was her unique response to her love of nature.
Does this remind one of Van Gogh?
I am surprised this summary did not include Seraphine’s devotion to the Holy Mary. I believe that she was empowered by the great spirit that is the mystery of all creations.
I too, injured the movie and history of the this truly talented woman. Tragic really. I was looking to purchase a print however can’t find a site that sells any prints. Also any sites I find on pricing, require a feet join. Not going to happen. I’ll keep looking.….what a sad story but what beauty she left behind.
Appreciating the art
I watched the movie last evening and was moved by Seraphine’s life and curious about how she interpreted the beauty of nature. The world is lucky that Wilhelm Uhde “discovered” her work.
Is there a chance enough of us could get together and show a demand for prints of Seraphine de Senlis work that a producer just might feel it would be worthwhile to produce the prints? There are so many prints of Monet’s work and other artists. It seems a terrible shame that Seraphine’s work cannot be appreciated except by a very lucky few.